Legal Opinion
United States v. Arthur Robinson
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided December 23, 1975No. 75--1553PublishedCited by 36 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JOHN W. PECK, Circuit Judge.
Defendant-appellant was convicted at a jury trial in district court of taking “by intimidation” of a bank teller about twelve hundred fifty dollars belonging to a federally-insured bank. 18 U.S.C. § 2113(a) (1970). On appeal, appellant challenges the sufficiency of the evidence to support the jury’s implicit finding of “intimidation.” 1 The standard against which the evidence must be considered has recently been restated by this court:
“Of course, in testing the sufficiency of the evidence, the evidence as well as the inferences properly deducible therefrom must be…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- United States v. George Camillo JacquillonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1972
- United States v. Maurice Pierre RoustioCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1972
- United States v. Richard Daniel AlsopCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1973
- United States v. Thomas W. ShippCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1966
- United States v. BakerDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1955
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by36 opinions
- United States v. Tommy Ray HigdonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1987
- United States v. David Henson, A/K/A Paul v. AndrewsCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1991
- United States v. McCartyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1994
- United States v. Kevin GilmoreCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2002
- United States v. James Everett PerryCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1993
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.