Legal Opinion
Dahl v. Petroplex Acidizing, Inc.
District Court, D. New Mexico
Decided January 2, 2024No. 2:22-cv-00252Unknown
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO DARVIN DAHL, individually and on behalf of all those similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. Civ. No. 22-252 GJF/DLM PETROPLEX ACIDIZING, INC., Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER THIS MATTER is before the Court on Plaintiffs’ Motion for Conditional Certification [ECF 45] (“Motion”). The Motion is fully briefed. See ECFs 46 (“Response”); 47 (“Reply”). Having reviewed this record, the applicable law, and for the reasons explained below, the Court GRANTS IN PART the Motion and RESERVES RULING IN PART. I. BACKGROUND1 Defendant Petroplex…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Daimler AG v. BaumanSupreme Court of the United States · 2014
- Bristol-Myers Squibb Co. v. Superior Court of Cal., San Francisco Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 2017
- Omni Capital International, Ltd. v. Rudolf Wolff & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Genesis HealthCare Corp. v. SymczykSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
- Brooklyn Savings Bank v. O'NeilSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.