Legal Opinion

Gordon v. Easy Washing Mach. Corp.

District Court, N.D. New York

Decided August 13, 1940Published

1Opinion of the Court

BRYANT, District Judge.

This case is the successor to litigation begun by plaintiff against one of the customers of defendant, charging infringement of the same claims of the two Gordon patents, which are here involved. Defendant defended in the prior suit and now admits that it is bound by the decree of validity and infringement therein rendered. However,‘it asserts that, prior to the commencement of this action, it ceased infringing the so-called first Gordon patent and has not manufactured ironing machines embodying the precise Construction held to infringe the second Gordon patent. In a…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Root v. Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1882
  2. General Electric Co. v. New England Electric Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1904
  3. Tompkins v. St. Regis Paper Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1916
  4. Steinfur Patents Corporation v. William Beyer, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1932
  5. Brookfield v. Elmer GlassworksU.S. Circuit Court for the District of New Jersey · 1904

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API