Legal Opinion

Hauser v. Dayton Police Dept. (Slip Opinion)

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided August 28, 2014No. 2013-0291 and 2013-0493PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFrench, J.

{¶ 1} This case concerns the immunity of political-subdivision employees and the statute that removes such immunity if “[c]ivil liability is expressly imposed upon the employee by a section of the Revised Code.” R.C. 2744.03(A)(6)(c). We conclude that the employment-discrimination provisions in R.C. 4112.01(A)(2) and 4112.02(A) do not expressly impose civil liability on such employees, but instead impose vicarious liability on the political subdivision itself.

Background

{¶ 2} This appeal arises from an employment-discrimination action filed by appellee, Anita Hauser, against the Dayton Police…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Meritor Savings Bank, FSB v. VinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Westfield Insurance v. GalatisOhio Supreme Court · 2003
  3. Phyllis Miller v. Maxwell's International Inc., Dba Maxwell's Plum, Debtor in Possession Carlo Galazzo, Gen. Mgt., Dino La Rosa Don Bohn Don SchupakCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
  4. Packard Motor Car Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  5. Plumbers & Steamfitters Joint Apprenticeship Committee v. Ohio Civil Rights CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1981

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Parker v. Strawser Constr., Inc.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 2018
  2. Cameron v. Univ. of ToledoOhio Court of Appeals · 2018
  3. Anderson v. Bright Horizons Children's Ctrs., L.L.C.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2022
  4. Johnson-Newberry v. Cuyahoga Cty. Child & Family Servs.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2019
  5. Tanksley v. HowellOhio Court of Appeals · 2020

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API