Hauser v. Dayton Police Dept. (Slip Opinion)
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtFrench, J.
{¶ 1} This case concerns the immunity of political-subdivision employees and the statute that removes such immunity if “[c]ivil liability is expressly imposed upon the employee by a section of the Revised Code.” R.C. 2744.03(A)(6)(c). We conclude that the employment-discrimination provisions in R.C. 4112.01(A)(2) and 4112.02(A) do not expressly impose civil liability on such employees, but instead impose vicarious liability on the political subdivision itself.
Background
{¶ 2} This appeal arises from an employment-discrimination action filed by appellee, Anita Hauser, against the Dayton Police…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Meritor Savings Bank, FSB v. VinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Westfield Insurance v. GalatisOhio Supreme Court · 2003
- Phyllis Miller v. Maxwell's International Inc., Dba Maxwell's Plum, Debtor in Possession Carlo Galazzo, Gen. Mgt., Dino La Rosa Don Bohn Don SchupakCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
- Packard Motor Car Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Plumbers & Steamfitters Joint Apprenticeship Committee v. Ohio Civil Rights CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1981
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Parker v. Strawser Constr., Inc.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 2018
- Cameron v. Univ. of ToledoOhio Court of Appeals · 2018
- Anderson v. Bright Horizons Children's Ctrs., L.L.C.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2022
- Johnson-Newberry v. Cuyahoga Cty. Child & Family Servs.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2019
- Tanksley v. HowellOhio Court of Appeals · 2020
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.