Legal Opinion
Wileman Bros. & Elliott, Inc. v. Giannini
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided July 10, 1990No. 88-15731PublishedCited by 57 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
TASHIMA, District Judge:
BACKGROUND
Appellants (plaintiffs) are growers of nectarines and plums who also pack, ship, and market their fruit and that of other growers. Under the Agricultural Marketing Agreement Act of 1937 (the “Act”), 7 U.S.C. § 601 et seq., therefore, they are both “producers” and “handlers.” 7 U.S.C. § 608c(l). Appellees (defendants) are nectarine and plum producers who compete with plaintiffs, and who served either as members of administrative committees appointed by the Secretary of Agriculture (the “Secretary”) pursuant to his authority under the Act, 7 U.S.C. § 610(b)(1),…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Mistretta v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Block v. Community Nutrition InstituteSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- United States v. Borden Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Carter v. Carter Coal Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Keogh v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1922
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by57 opinions
- Federal Savings and Loan Insurance Corporation v. Gemini ManagementCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- Brown v. Ticor Title Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1992
- Bricker v. Rockwell International Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
- Brown v. Ticor Title InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- McCray v. Fidelity National Title InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2012
52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.