Legal Opinion
Hurvich v. City of Birmingham
Alabama Court of Appeals
Decided May 23, 1950No. 6 Div. 8PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HARWOOD, Judge.
On appeal from his conviction in the Recorder’s Court of the City of Birmingham this appellant was again adjudged guilty by the circuit court, sitting without a jury, of violating Section 602 of the General City Code of Birmingham of 1944.
Section 602, supra, reads as follows: “It shall be unlawful for any person, either as principal, agent or employee of another to have in his possession or custody at any place in the City any machine or device which has, or includes, one or more movable constituents or parts designed to be set in motion as a means of playing, or engaging in a…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Town of Greensboro v. EhrenreichSupreme Court of Alabama · 1886
- State Ex Rel. Green v. One 5¢ Fifth Inning Base Ball MacHineSupreme Court of Alabama · 1941
- Gilchrist Drug Co. v. City of BirminghamSupreme Court of Alabama · 1937
- State v. One "Jack and Jill" PinballMissouri Court of Appeals · 1949
- Town of Boaz v. JenkinsAlabama Court of Appeals · 1946
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Atkins v. City of Tarrant CityCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1979
- Connor v. City of BirminghamAlabama Court of Appeals · 1952
- Winter v. CainSupreme Court of Alabama · 1966
- Benson W. Peak v. City of Tuscaloosa.Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2011
- Downey v. City of Bay MinetteAlabama Court of Appeals · 1958
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.