Legal Opinion
Jones v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided October 15, 1996No. Civil Action 89-0552(RCL)PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION II
LAMBERTH, District Judge.
The court today issues this Memorandum Opinion II and accompanying order covering non-jury issues tried before the court. Separately issued this date is Order and Memorandum Opinion I, which sets the background of this litigation and addresses several motions by defendant Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority (WMA-TA), including its motion for judgment as a matter of law or, in the alternative, for a new trial.
Because the unlawful acts alleged in this ease predate the Civil Rights Act of 1991, the court rather than the jury must decide…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- St. Mary's Honor Center v. HicksSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Landgraf v. USI Film ProductsSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Trans World Airlines, Inc. v. ThurstonSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Jones v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit AuthorityCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2000
- Carmen Jean-Baptiste v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013
- Jones v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit AuthorityDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1996
- Vorster v. BowenDistrict Court, C.D. California · 1989