Legal Opinion
Jones v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided October 15, 1996No. Civil Action 89-0552 (RCL)PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER AND MEMORANDUM OPINION I
LAMBERTH, District Judge.
This case comes before the court on three motions by defendant Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority (WMATA). Upon consideration of the filings and oral argument of counsel, the relevant law, and for the reasons more fully set forth below, it is hereby ORDERED that:
1. WMATA’s motion for leave to file a post-hearing brief is hereby GRANTED. The Clerk of the Court is directed to file the lodged brief.
2. WMATA’s motion to amend its previous legal memorandum opposing plaintiff Jones’ motion for partial summary judgment is hereby…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- St. Mary's Honor Center v. HicksSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Landgraf v. USI Film ProductsSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Price Waterhouse v. HopkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Hazen Paper Co. v. BigginsSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Jones v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit AuthorityCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2000
- Elion v. JacksonDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2008
- United States Steel, LLC v. Tieco, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2001
- Copley v. Bax Global, Inc.District Court, S.D. Florida · 2000
- Higbee v. BillingtonDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2003
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.