Legal Opinion
Hygema v. Markley
Supreme Court of Florida
Decided February 28, 1939PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
The appeal brings for review a final decree containing interalia the following
"IT IS THEREUPON ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED as follows, to-wit:
"1. That the Decrees pro Confessos heretofore entered herein against Virgil Everets, Willie Belle Bartons, Ty Cobb, Hattie Williams, Julia Brunson, also known as Julia Brensen, Mamie Robertson, Nola Daniels, Laura Butler also known as Lora Butler, Hillyarde Myers also known as Hilliard Myers, Willie Bartons, George White, Charlie Rouse, P.R. King, also known as Preston R. King, Essex Robertson, Mamie Robertson and Quinn Wood, defendants in this cause,…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Kreiss Potassium Phosphate Co. v. KnightSupreme Court of Florida · 1929
- Olmstead v. . LatimerNew York Court of Appeals · 1899
- Davis v. StoutIndiana Supreme Court · 1890
- Marshall Field Co. v. Oren Ruffcorn Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1902
- Fridenberg v. RobinsonSupreme Court of Florida · 1872
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Argonaut Development Group, Inc. v. SWH Funding Corp.District Court, S.D. Florida · 2001
- Camina Services, Inc. v. Shell Oil Co.District Court, S.D. Florida · 1992
- CRMSuite Corporation v. General Motors CompanyDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 2021
- Shadek v. KiddDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 2025