Walton & Stockton v. Corpus Christi Nat. Bank
Court of Appeals of Texas
Appeal from Nueces County Court; Walter P. Timón, Judge. Action by Walton & Stockton against G. C. Orand, with writ of garnishment against the Corpus Christi National Bank, and intervention by defendant in the garnishment suit.
1Opinion of the CourtFly, C. J.
Appellants sued G. C. Orand for supplies furnished, and applied for and obtained a distress warrant, and afterwards applied for a writ of garnishment directed against the Corpus Christi National Bank. The garnishee, on July 20, 1914, answered, admitting that it was indebted to G. C. Orand in the sum of $109.75. Afterwards, on November 16, 1914, G. C. Orand, defendant in the original suit, intervened in the garnishment suit, which, of course, was separately docketed from the suit for debt, and moved to quash the garnishment proceedings for certain reasons therein stated. The motion to quash…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Bateman & Bro. v. MaddoxTexas Supreme Court · 1894
3Cited by7 opinions
- In Re Texas American Express, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2005
- Varner v. Koons, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)1994
- Proctor v. Associates Inv. Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1953
- King v. TomCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1961
- Shiflett v. Associated Oil & Gas Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1967
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.