Legal Opinion

Proctor v. Associates Inv. Co.

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided April 16, 1953No. 12510PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CODY, Justice.

This was- ,a garnishment proceeding in which the defendant in the main action, and an intervenor, filed a cross-action against the plaintiff in garnishment for damages as for wrongful impounding of funds in the hands of the garnishee. In the main action the plaintiff recovered an indebtedness against the defendant .in’the sum of $2,393.-65. The judgment in the main action was duly affirmed before the judgment was tendered in the garnishment proceeding. See Proctor v. Associates Inv. Co., Tex.Civ.App., 245 S.W.2d 501.

The main action in the district court of Harris County bore the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Roberts v. StonehamCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1930
  2. Walton & Stockton v. Corpus Christi Nat. BankCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1916
  3. Proctor v. Associates Inv. Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1952

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Daniels v. Pecan Valley Ranch, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1992
  2. Transceiver Corp. of America v. Ring Around Products, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1979
  3. Smith v. MillerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1955
  4. Shiflett v. Associated Oil & Gas Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1967
  5. A. Wolfson's, Inc. v. First State Bank of Corpus ChristiCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1988

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API