Legal Opinion
Brent Webber v. SAG-AFTRA & Sean Astin
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided May 21, 2026No. 2:26-cv-03003Unknown
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY BRENT WEBBER, Civil Action No. 26-3003 (SDW) (MAH) Plaintiff, v. SAG-AFTRA & SEAN ASTIN, REPORT & RECOMMENDATION Defendants. I. INTRODUCTION Presently before the Court is the motion of Plaintiff pro se Brent Webber (“Plaintiff”) to remand this matter to state court, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1447(c). Mot. to Remand, Mar. 27, 2026, D.E. 13. Defendants SAG-AFTRA and Sean Astin (“Astin” and, together with SAG- AFTRA, “Defendants”) oppose the motion, and Plaintiff filed a reply. Defs.’ Opp’n, Apr. 13, 2026, D.E. 25; Pl.’s Reply, Apr. 17, 2026,…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Caterpillar Inc. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Franchise Tax Bd. of Cal. v. Construction Laborers Vacation Trust for Southern Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Allis-Chalmers Corp. v. LueckSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. MottleySupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- Local 174, Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen & Helpers v. Lucas Flour Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.