Goodwin v. Wright
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the CourtEllington, J.
— Kenneth Goodwin was injured when a rebuilt hydraulic cylinder failed. Eastside Machine had made the cylinder by disassembling two others and making one. Eastside was insured by Western National Assurance Company under a commercial general liability policy. The only question on appeal is whether Western National properly denied coverage for Goodwin’s injuries based on the “products — completed operations hazard” exclusion in Eastside’s policy. We hold the products — completed operations hazard exclusion is unambiguous and bars coverage for Goodwin’s injuries. We therefore affirm.
Facts
In…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Olympic Steamship Co., Inc. v. Centennial Ins. Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1991
- McDonald v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1992
- Grange Insurance Co. v. BrosseauWashington Supreme Court · 1989
- Allstate Ins. Co. v. PeasleyWashington Supreme Court · 1997
- Allstate Insurance v. PeasleyWashington Supreme Court · 1997
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Architechtonics Construction Management, Inc. v. KhorramCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2002
- Secura Insurance v. Gray Construction, Inc.District Court, W.D. Kentucky · 2010
- Baker v. National Interstate InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
- Goodwin v. WrightCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2000
- Mutual of Enumclaw Insurance v. Patrick Archer Construction, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2004
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.