Legal Opinion

Goodwin v. Wright

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided March 27, 2000No. 43749-6-IPublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEllington, J.

— Kenneth Goodwin was injured when a rebuilt hydraulic cylinder failed. Eastside Machine had made the cylinder by disassembling two others and making one. Eastside was insured by Western National Assurance Company under a commercial general liability policy. The only question on appeal is whether Western National properly denied coverage for Goodwin’s injuries based on the “products — completed operations hazard” exclusion in Eastside’s policy. We hold the products — completed operations hazard exclusion is unambiguous and bars coverage for Goodwin’s injuries. We therefore affirm.

Facts

In…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Olympic Steamship Co., Inc. v. Centennial Ins. Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1991
  2. McDonald v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Grange Insurance Co. v. BrosseauWashington Supreme Court · 1989
  4. Allstate Ins. Co. v. PeasleyWashington Supreme Court · 1997
  5. Allstate Insurance v. PeasleyWashington Supreme Court · 1997

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Architechtonics Construction Management, Inc. v. KhorramCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2002
  2. Secura Insurance v. Gray Construction, Inc.District Court, W.D. Kentucky · 2010
  3. Baker v. National Interstate InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
  4. Goodwin v. WrightCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2000
  5. Mutual of Enumclaw Insurance v. Patrick Archer Construction, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2004

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API