Legal Opinion

Briare v. Matthews

California Superior Court

Decided July 1, 1925No. 17317Published

1Opinion of the Court

*65This is an action prosecuted by plaintiff, as a taxpayer on behalf of the city of Stockton, against defendants to recover the sum of $324.00 paid to defendant C. O. Smith for salary as a patrolman for the city of Stockton, and to recover the sum of $2010.00 paid to defendant Madeline Fotheringham for salary as a member of the police force of the city of Stockton, and which moneys it is claimed by plaintiff were illegally paid by reason of the fact that the respective appointments of Smith and Fothering-ham were illegal, neither being entitled to hold the office to which he was appointed,…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Great Western Power Co. v. PillsburyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
  2. Osburn v. StoneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
  3. Bannerman v. BoyleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
  4. County of Los Angeles v. LankershimCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
  5. Satterlee v. San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1863

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API