In Re Nomination Petition of Carroll
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1DissentJustice Baer
While the Majority emphasizes our mandate in statutory interpretation to effectuate the intent of the General Assembly, and acknowledges that legislative intent typically is reflected in a statute’s plain language, it construes the Public Official and Employee Ethics Act (Ethics Act or Act), 65 Pa.C.S. §§ 1101, et seq., to permit Timothy J. Carroll (Candidate) to appear on the primary ballot despite his failure to make a mandatory disclosure under the Act. Because I believe this result defies the Ethics Act’s plain language, I respectfully dissent.
The Commonwealth Court found fatal to…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Borough of Pottstown v. Pennsylvania Municipal Retirement BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
- Baranyai v. AndrezjwskiSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
- In Re BenninghoffSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
- In Re Nomination Petition of AnastasioCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
- In Re Nominating Petitions of BraxtonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.