Legal Opinion

In Re Nominating Petitions of Braxton

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 3, 2005No. 217 EAL 2005PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

2Per curiam

AND NOW, this 3rd day of May, 2005, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is hereby GRANTED. Respondent did not disclose anywhere on his Statement of Financial Interests the sources of his rental income and the names and addresses of the creditors holding mortgages on his rental properties. See 65 Pa.C.S. § 1105(b)(4), (b)(5). In light of these omissions, the Order of the Commonwealth Court, which allowed Respondent to amend his Statement of Financial Interests and remain on the ballot, is REVERSED, and Respondent John L. Braxton’s name is ordered to be STRICKEN from the primary ballot…

3Cases cited1 opinion

  1. In Re BenninghoffSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2004

4Cited by15 opinions

  1. In Re Nomination of PaulmierSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
  2. In Re Nomination Petition of CarrollSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
  3. In re Nomination Petition of GuzzardiSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
  4. In Re Nomination Petition of LittlepageSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
  5. In Re Nominating Petition of BradyCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2007

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API