Goetzel v. Goetzel
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtTaft, J.
As indicated in the foregoing statement of the case, the wife, in the prior divorce proceeding, not only sought alimony from the husband but she also pleaded in her cross-petition and amended cross-petition the 1942 agreement to convey the Arbor Place property, and she asked the court to order the husband to specifically perform that agreement. In the instant case she pleads the same agreement and asks for the same relief.
Although the wife did amend her amended cross-petition in the divorce proceeding so as to withdraw “her prayer for divorce” she then at that time again prayed the court to…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Larimore v. WellsOhio Supreme Court · 1875
- Clark v. BaranowskiOhio Supreme Court · 1924
- Massillon Savings & Loan Co. v. Imperial Finance Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1926
- Materazzo v. MaterazzoOhio Supreme Court · 1941