Legal Opinion

Smith v. Auburn University

District Court, M.D. Alabama

Decided March 18, 2002No. CIV.A. 00-D-1561-EPublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

DE MENT, District Judge.

Before the court is a Motion For Summary Judgment which, along with a supporting brief, was filed on February 11, 2002 by Defendants Auburn University, Barry A. Robertson (“Robertson”), and Harvey O. Dahl (“Dahl”) (collectively “Defendants”). (Doc. Nos.18-19.) Plaintiffs Rhonda Lynn Smith and Clinton A. Smith (“Plaintiffs”) filed a Brief in Opposition on February 27 (Doc. No. 23), to which Defendants filed a timely Reply on March 6. (Doc. No. 25.) After careful consideration of the arguments of counsel, the relevant law, and the record as a…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
  5. Will v. Michigan Department of State PoliceSupreme Court of the United States · 1989

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Engel v. Rapid City School DistrictCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2007
  2. Short v. Immokalee Water & Sewer DistrictDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 2016
  3. Mosakowski v. PSS World Medical, Inc.District Court, D. Arizona · 2003
  4. Jackson v. Cintas Corp.District Court, M.D. Alabama · 2005
  5. Batayias v. The Mechanical Shop, Inc.District Court, S.D. Georgia · 2020

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API