Legal Opinion
Klimple v. Bahl
North Dakota Supreme Court
Decided February 1, 2007No. 20060195Published
1Opinion of the Court
727 N.W.2d 256 (2007)
2007 ND 13
Gary D. KLIMPLE, Plaintiff and Appellant
v.
Mark BAHL, Defendant and Appellee.
No. 20060195.
Supreme Court of North Dakota.
February 1, 2007.
Carey A. Goetz, Farhart Wolff, P.C., Minot, N.D., for plaintiff and appellant; submitted on brief.
Bradley J. Beehler, Morley Law Firm, Ltd., Grand Forks, N.D., for defendant and appellee; submitted on brief.
CROTHERS, Justice.
[¶ 1] Gary D. Klimple appealed from a summary judgment dismissing his personal injury action against Mark Bahl. We affirm because Klimple presented insufficient admissible evidence to create a genuine issue…
Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.
2Cases cited40 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Palace Bar, Inc. v. FearnotIndiana Supreme Court · 1978
- Grenz v. WerreNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1964
- Peterson v. ZerrNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1991
- Butz v. WernerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1989
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.