Legal Opinion
Bagley v. Big "E" Industries
Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma
Decided June 20, 1989No. 71346PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
BAILEY, Chief Judge:
Upon consideration of the briefs, exhibits and record in the above styled matter, the Court FINDS that:
1. Petitioner seeks review of the Trial Court’s order commuting twenty-five percent (25%) of award to lump sum, and directing payment of commuted sum to Petitioner’s ex-wife in satisfaction of child support arrearage. In 1979, Petitioner and his then-wife were divorced in Texas, and Petitioner directed to pay $200/month child support. Petitioner made no child support payments at any time, and as of January, 1987, was about $18,000 in arrears.
2. In May,…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Meadows v. MeadowsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1980
- Cities Service Gas Company v. WittSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1972
- Commons v. BraggSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938
- Pine, Adm'r v. DavisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1944
- Mid-Continent Casualty Company v. MillerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1968
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- LOYD v. MICHELIN NORTH AMERICA, INC.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2016
- Bill Cooper Frac Tank Co. v. Columbia Regional HospitalCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1993
- LOYD v. MICHELIN NORTH AMERICA, INC.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2016
- Littlethunder v. State ex rel. Oklahoma State Department of Human ServicesCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1993
- R & R Trucking, Inc. v. VinsonCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1991