Hopkins v. Kidd
Supreme Court of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Grice, Justice.
It is a familiar rule that pleadings must be construed most strongly against the pleader. So construing the .allegations as to the residence of the defendant executrix, it must be held that the petition on its face shows that Mrs. Kidd was a resident of DeKalb County, Georgia. See Crawford v. Wilson, 142 Ga. 734 (83 S. E. 667). In so construing the petition, we are not at variance with plaintiffs’ position as to that matter. The brief of their counsel recites: “All of the defendants, excepting two of them, reside in Glynn County; one of the two residing in the State of…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Girtman v. GirtmanSupreme Court of Georgia · 1940
- Morrison v. McFarlandSupreme Court of Georgia · 1917
- First National Bank v. HoldernessSupreme Court of Georgia · 1940
- Martin v. GaissertSupreme Court of Georgia · 1910
- Radcliffe v. JonesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1932
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Calhoun v. Babcock Bros. Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1945
- Clay v. SmithSupreme Court of Georgia · 1951
- Banks v. City of HamptonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2006