Legal Opinion

In the Matter of the Complaint of SDS Lumber Co as owner or owner pro hac vice and operator of the tug DAUBY ON 641327 for Limitation of Liability

District Court, W.D. Washington

Decided May 7, 2021No. 3:20-cv-05767Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 9 10 S.D.S. LUMBER CO., CASE NO. C20-5767 MJP 11 Petitioner, ORDER DENYING CLAIMANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS; 12 v. GRANTING PETITIONER’S 13 KEVIN GREGORY, et al., MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT 14 Claimants. 15 16 This matter comes before the Court upon Claimants’ Motion to Dismiss the Amended 17 Complaint (Dkt. No. 37) and Petitioner’s Cross-Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (Dkt. No. 18 42). Having read the Motion, Cross-Motion and Response (Dkt. No. 42), Replies (Dkt. Nos. 51, 19 54), and all related…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Sebelius v. Auburn Regional Medical CenterSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
  4. United States v. Kwai Fun WongSupreme Court of the United States · 2015
  5. Miller v. HermanCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2010

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API