Legal Opinion

Disciplinary Counsel v. Lentes

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided December 11, 2008No. 2008-1709PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Per curiam

{¶ 1} Respondent, John Robert Lentes of Gallipolis, Ohio, Attorney Registration No. 0029906, was admitted to the practice of law in Ohio in 1985. The Board of Commissioners on Grievances and Discipline recommends that we permanently disbar respondent, based on findings that he systematically deceived clients through lies about fictitious complaints, hearings, and other legal proceedings, in one case even fabricating a judgment entry, and also disregarded efforts to investigate this misconduct. We find that respondent committed these unconscionable acts, that he thereby flagrantly violated…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Disciplinary Counsel v. FreemanOhio Supreme Court · 2008
  2. Columbus Bar Ass'n v. SternerOhio Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Blessing v. BlessingOhio Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Columbus Bar Assn. v. FinneranOhio Supreme Court · 1997
  5. Akron Bar Ass'n v. HolderOhio Supreme Court · 2006

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. PembertonOhio Court of Appeals · 2011
  2. Disciplinary Counsel v. SquireOhio Supreme Court · 2011
  3. Disciplinary Counsel v. HoranOhio Supreme Court · 2009
  4. Disciplinary Counsel v. NicksOhio Supreme Court · 2010
  5. Disciplinary Counsel v. TerbeekOhio Supreme Court · 2013

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API