Legal Opinion

Disciplinary Counsel v. Terbeek

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided May 16, 2013No. 2012-2056PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

{¶ 1} Respondent, Jeffrey Lee Terbeek of Columbus, Ohio, Attorney Registration No. 0033227, was admitted to the practice of law in Ohio in 1973.

{¶ 2} In June 2012, a probable-cause panel of the Board of Commissioners on Grievances and Discipline certified a complaint filed by relator, disciplinary counsel, against Terbeek. The complaint alleged that he had misappropriated funds that he was obligated to hold in escrow for the individual who sold a business to his client, that he had admitted that he used those funds for personal purposes, and that he had failed to disclose his misappropriation…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Stark Cty. Bar Assn. v. ButtacavoliOhio Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Disciplinary Counsel v. BroerenOhio Supreme Court · 2007
  3. Disciplinary Counsel v. FreemanOhio Supreme Court · 2008
  4. Cleveland Bar Assn. v. DixonOhio Supreme Court · 2002
  5. Cleveland Metropolitan Bar Ass'n v. FreemanOhio Supreme Court · 2011

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Disciplinary Counsel v. WardOhio Supreme Court · 2015
  2. In re Resignation of TerbeekOhio Supreme Court · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API