Legal Opinion

Micalizzi v. Rumsfeld

District Court, D. Vermont

Decided January 2, 2003No. 2:00-cv-00473Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

SESSIONS, Chief Judge.

This action stems from the termination of Frank Micalizzi’s employment at Merlin Express, Inc. (“Merlin”). After his discharge Micalizzi filed an administrative complaint against Merlin with the Department of Defense (“DOD”), pursuant to 10 U.S.C. § 2409a (1988 ed. Supp. V, 1993) (repealed 1994), which prohibited discrimination against defense contractor whistle-blowers. DOD determined that the complaint was not covered by the statute and refused to adjudicate it. Micalizzi seeks a declaration from this Court that his administrative complaint falls…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Cardoza-FonsecaSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  3. United States v. Mead Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2001
  4. Robinson v. Shell Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1997
  5. Auer v. RobbinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1997

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API