Legal Opinion
Robinson v. United States
District Court, N.D. Ohio
Decided July 23, 2008No. Case 5:07 CV 02092, 5:01 CR 00259PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OF OPINION AND ORDER DENYING PETITIONER RELIEF UNDER 28 U.S.C. § 2255.
LESLEY WELLS, District Judge.
Petitioner James Howard Robinson (“Mr. Robinson”) seeks to vacate or correct his sentence pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255. (Doc. 99: 1 CR 259). In his three-paragraph pleading, Mr. Robinson maintains, through counsel, that his “sentence was imposed in violation of the Constitution or laws of the United States and is subject to collateral attack, including a claim of ineffective assistance of counsel.” Id. The government responded to Mr. Robinson’s petition by arguing that it was both…
2Cases cited41 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Slack v. McDanielSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Hill v. LockhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Schlup v. DeloSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Davidson v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Tennessee · 2020
- Duerson v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Kentucky · 2023
- O'Kelly v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Tennessee · 2020