Legal Opinion

O'Kelly v. United States

District Court, E.D. Tennessee

Decided September 24, 2020No. 1:19-cv-00322Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE AT CHATTANOOGA TRISTIAN O’KELLEY, ) ) No. 1:19-cv-322, 1:17-cr-16 Petitioner, ) ) Judge Mattice v. ) Magistrate Judge Lee ) UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) ) Respondent. ) MEMORANDUM OPINION Before the Court is Petitioner Tristian O’Kelley’s Motion to Vacate under

28 U.S.C. § 2255

[No. 1:19-cv-322, Doc. 1; No. 1:17-cr-16, Doc. 38]. Petitioner argues that in light of Rehaif v. United States,

139 S. Ct. 2191

(2019), he is actually innocent of possessing a firearm as a felon and his indictment was defective. Because it plainly appears on the…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Slack v. McDanielSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. United States v. FradySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  3. Rehaif v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2019
  4. United States v. BroceSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  5. United States v. AddonizioSupreme Court of the United States · 1979

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API