Legal Opinion

State v. Weiland

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided June 16, 1972No. 38277PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMcCown, J.

The defendant appeals from the denial of an evidentiary hearing on his motion for post conviction relief. His original conviction and sentence were affirmed on direct appeal in State v. Weiland, 186 Neb. 325, 183 N. W. 2d 244.

The motion essentially asserts (1) that perjury was knowingly used to convict the defendant at the original trial; and (2) that testimony as to a polygraph test of an accomplice witness was improperly introduced. The second issue was considered and decided by this court in the direct appeal.

The factual issues involving the allegations of perjury rest entirely upon…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. HizelNebraska Supreme Court · 1967
  2. State v. LincolnNebraska Supreme Court · 1971
  3. State v. WeilandNebraska Supreme Court · 1971

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. HoltanNebraska Supreme Court · 1980
  2. State v. WeilandNebraska Supreme Court · 1973
  3. Bobby Joe Weiland v. Robert F. Parratt, Warden, Nebraska State PenitentiaryCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1976
  4. State v. PrattNebraska Supreme Court · 1987
  5. State v. BlackwellNebraska Supreme Court · 1974

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API