State v. Weiland
Nebraska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtSpencer, J.
This appeal involves the single issue as to whether defendant should have been granted a mistrial because of a reference to a polygraph test taken by a witness against the defendant. We affirm.
The issue may be narrowed to the question, can a defendant on cross-examination secure a mistrial because he elicits a response which, while correct, may be prejudicial to him?
The testimony involved is as follows: “Q- Did you handle that with the County Attorney’s Office, discuss with the county attorney the filing of charges against Phyllis Croghan? A- Yes. Q- You recommended that, didnt (sic) you? A-…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- United States v. Salvatore ApuzzoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1957
- State v. SnellNebraska Supreme Court · 1964
- Davis v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1960
- State v. HomanNebraska Supreme Court · 1966
3Cited by7 opinions
- State v. TomrdleNebraska Supreme Court · 1983
- State v. WeilandNebraska Supreme Court · 1973
- State v. TempleNebraska Supreme Court · 1974
- State v. HarperNebraska Supreme Court · 1983
- Bobby Joe Weiland v. Robert F. Parratt, Warden, Nebraska State PenitentiaryCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1976
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.