Legal Opinion

State v. Weiland

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided January 22, 1971No. 37627PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSpencer, J.

This appeal involves the single issue as to whether defendant should have been granted a mistrial because of a reference to a polygraph test taken by a witness against the defendant. We affirm.

The issue may be narrowed to the question, can a defendant on cross-examination secure a mistrial because he elicits a response which, while correct, may be prejudicial to him?

The testimony involved is as follows: “Q- Did you handle that with the County Attorney’s Office, discuss with the county attorney the filing of charges against Phyllis Croghan? A- Yes. Q- You recommended that, didnt (sic) you? A-…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. United States v. Salvatore ApuzzoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1957
  2. State v. SnellNebraska Supreme Court · 1964
  3. Davis v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1960
  4. State v. HomanNebraska Supreme Court · 1966

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. TomrdleNebraska Supreme Court · 1983
  2. State v. WeilandNebraska Supreme Court · 1973
  3. State v. TempleNebraska Supreme Court · 1974
  4. State v. HarperNebraska Supreme Court · 1983
  5. Bobby Joe Weiland v. Robert F. Parratt, Warden, Nebraska State PenitentiaryCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1976

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API