Bianchini v. N.K.D.S. Associates Ltd.
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
POPOVICH, Judge:
This case involves an appeal from the March 17, 1992, order sustaining the preliminary objections in the nature of a demurrer against the plaintiffs/appellants, Tina M. Bianchini and Michael Bianchini. We affirm.
The standard utilized in reviewing the propriety of decisions sustaining preliminary objections in the nature of a demurrer is well-established; to-wit:
It is axiomatic in the law of pleading that preliminary objections in the nature of a demurrer admit as true all well and clearly pleaded material, factual averments and all inferences fairly deducible therefrom.…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Roe v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Speck v. FinegoldSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
- Marino EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1970
- Greenspan v. United Services Automobile Ass'nSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
- Hatter v. LandsbergSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Catlin v. HamburgSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2012