Legal Opinion

Bianchini v. N.K.D.S. Associates Ltd.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 16, 1992No. 1434PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

POPOVICH, Judge:

This case involves an appeal from the March 17, 1992, order sustaining the preliminary objections in the nature of a demurrer against the plaintiffs/appellants, Tina M. Bianchini and Michael Bianchini. We affirm.

The standard utilized in reviewing the propriety of decisions sustaining preliminary objections in the nature of a demurrer is well-established; to-wit:

It is axiomatic in the law of pleading that preliminary objections in the nature of a demurrer admit as true all well and clearly pleaded material, factual averments and all inferences fairly deducible therefrom.…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Roe v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Speck v. FinegoldSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  3. Marino EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1970
  4. Greenspan v. United Services Automobile Ass'nSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  5. Hatter v. LandsbergSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Catlin v. HamburgSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API