Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Gruver Drilling Co. v. Morrow

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided July 5, 1927No. 16635PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HERR, C.

This is an appeal from an order of the State Industrial Commission awarding compensation to respondent, Guy Morrow, under Workmen’s Compensation Act, against the petitioner, Gruver Drilling Company, and its insurance carrier.

C'aimant, Guy Morrow, was injured on the 12th day of December, 1924, while engaged in running casing in an oil well, which said casing was so being run by a concern known as the Dixon Casing Crew, operating under a contract with the Gruver Drilling Company, petitioner herein. The said Dixon Casing Crew had as its insurance carrier the Federal Surety Company.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Ohio Drilling Co. v. State Industrial CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1922
  2. Dixon Casing Crew v. State Industrial CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925
  3. Green v. State Industrial CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
  4. Knox & Shouse v. KnoxSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925
  5. Twin State Oil Co. v. ShipleySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Keeling v. Schuman Bros. Lbr. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1951
  2. Panther Coal Co. v. State Industrial CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1949
  3. Employers' Casualty Co. v. BennettSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1931

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API