Dixon Casing Crew v. State Industrial Commission
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the CourtLester, J.
This is an appeal from the findings of tbe State Industrial Commission. Tbe claim for compensation arose out of an injury Ito Itbe claimant which occurred on the 16th day of June, 1924, and presents a question of law only.
The claimant, with four others, who styled themselves the Dixon Casing Crew, were engaged in running and pulling casing for the Gruver Drilling Company, and were paid $55 per day for their joint labor. The men divided the proceeds equally among themselves, except that Dixon, the claimant, was paid ten per cent, for collecting and keeping the time book. It appears that the…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Ohio Drilling Co. v. State Industrial CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1922
3Cited by10 opinions
- Keeling v. Schuman Bros. Lbr. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1951
- Deatherage & Renfro v. StoreySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1932
- Newblock v. CaseySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1939
- Smittle v. RutherfordSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1941
- Twin State Oil Co. v. ShipleySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.