Legal Opinion
Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority v. Buchart-Horn, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Decided January 5, 1990No. 88-2965PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ERVIN, Chief Judge:
The defendant, Buchart-Horn, Inc., appeals from summary judgment entered against it after the Army Corps of Engineers Board of Contract Appeals ruled that Buchart-Horn provided substandard design specifications to its client, the Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority. Because we find that the parties’ contract did not confer jurisdiction over this dispute upon the Board of Contract Appeals, we reverse and remand for trial.
I
This construction contract dispute arises from structural problems that developed in the roof of Grosvenor Station on the Wash ington, D.C.,…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- United States v. Utah Construction & Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1966
- The Len Company and Associates v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1967
- Edward R. Marden Corporation v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1971
- Edward R. Marden Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1971
- Bethlehem Steel Corporation, and Bethlehem Steel Company v. Grace Line, Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1969
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Delon Hampton & Associates, Chartered Envirodyne Engineers, Incorporated v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit AuthorityCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1991
- Breda Transportation, Inc. v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit AuthorityDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2001
- Norair Engineering Corp. v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit AuthorityDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1998
- Breda Transportation, Inc. v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit AuthorityDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2001