State v. Outlaw
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
EAGLES, Judge.
Defendant assigns as error the trial judge’s denial of his motion for directed verdict based on the insufficiency of the evidence to show that defendant transported cocaine. Defendant contends that the evidence at trial did not show that he transported cocaine because his truck never left his property. The defendant argues that at most the evidence showed that he attempted to transport cocaine.
“Defendant’s motion to dismiss must be considered in light of all the evidence introduced by the State as well as that introduced by defendant.” State v. Perry, 316 N.C. 87, 95, 340 S.E.2d…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Cunard Steamship Co. v. MellonSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
- State v. BrownSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1984
- State v. CutlerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
- State v. RowlandSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
- State v. PerrySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1986
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- State v. HarringtonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2005
- State v. GreenidgeCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1991
- State v. CarmonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2003
- State v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2006
- State v. ALVARDOCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2010
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.