Carolina Power & Light Company v. Paul
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtHiggins, J.
North Carolina is committed to the general rule that the measure of damages for injury to personal property is the differ ence between the market value of the damaged -property immediately before and immediately after the injury. The purpose of the rule is to pay the owner for his loss. If the damaged article has market value, the application of the before and after rule is relatively simple. Even in that case, however, the cost of repairs is some evidence of the extent of the damage. Simrel v. Meeler, 238 N.C. 668, 78 S.E. 2d 766. However, if there is no market, there can be no market value.…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Phillips v. ChessonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
- New Jersey Power & Light Co. v. MabeeSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1964
- Central Illinois Light Co. v. StenzelAppellate Court of Illinois · 1963
- Southwestern Electric Power Co. v. Canal Ins. Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1960
- Simrel v. MeelerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- In Re the Appeal of AMP Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
- Shera v. N.C. State University Veterinary Teaching HospitalCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2012
- Ohio Power Co. v. ZemelkaOhio Court of Appeals · 1969
- Town of Beech Mountain v. Genesis Wildlife Sanctuary, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2016
- Hartford Electric Light Co. v. BeardConnecticut Appellate Court · 1965
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.