Legal Opinion

Ohio Power Co. v. Zemelka

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided September 16, 1969No. 1065 and 1066PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLyncti, P. J.

The only question in this case is whether a person liable for tbe destruction of an electric utility pole is entitled to a credit for accrued depreciation in computing damages due the public utility.

Defendants, appellees herein, admitted liability. The following cost to make the necessary repairs to replace the damaged utility pole is not in dispute:

Cost of pole $ 24.71

Cost of pole storage 3.21

Bill for labor, including fringe benefits and employee’s expenses 226.36

Transportation expenses 45.48

Administration and engineering expenses 44.96

Total bill $344.72

The trial court held that the proper…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. New Jersey Power & Light Co. v. MabeeSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1964
  2. Central Illinois Light Co. v. StenzelAppellate Court of Illinois · 1963
  3. Carolina Power & Light Company v. PaulSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964
  4. Southwestern Electric Power Co. v. Canal Ins. Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1960
  5. Ohio Power Co. v. JohnstonHancock County Court of Common Pleas · 1968

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Kansas Power & Light Co. v. ThatcherCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1990
  2. Cincinnati Bell, Inc. v. HinterlongHamilton County Municipal Court · 1981
  3. Ohio Edison Co. v. RoyerOhio Court of Appeals · 2018
  4. Puget Sound Power and Light Co. v. StrongWashington Supreme Court · 1991
  5. Cincinnati Bell, Inc. v. CooperHamilton County Municipal Court · 1985

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API