Legal Opinion

Smethurst v. Smethurst

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 9, 1936No. Civ. 5626PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THE COURT.

An order was made admitting the will of Prank A. Smethurst to probate notwithstanding the verdict of the jury in favor of contestants who claimed that at the time the will was executed, the testator was insane. This appeal is from that order and the judgment based thereon.

The testator, Prank A. Smethurst, was unmarried, sixty-two years of age, and in infancy had suffered an injury resulting in a curvature of the spine, which had left him physically handicapped, and with increasing years morose, quarrelsome and more and more inclined to seek relief in an excessive use of intoxicating…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Improvement Company v. MunsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1872
  2. Pleasants v. FantSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
  3. Smith v. NicholsSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
  4. Estate of CasparCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
  5. Finkler v. PurcellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Weck v. Los Angeles County Flood Control DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
  2. Estate of SelbCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
  3. Smith v. FrederickCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1940
  4. Estate of StoneCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
  5. In Re Cissel's EstateMontana Supreme Court · 1937

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API