Legal Opinion
Starner v. Guardian Industries
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided May 31, 2001No. 00AP-113PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Kennedy, Judge.
Plaintiffs-appellants, Jane Starner and Heidi Fravel, appeal from a decision of the Franklin County Court of Common Pleas granting the summary judgment motion of defendants-appellees, Guardian Industries, Guardian Automotive Products, Inc., Guardian Glass Company, and Keith Hoover.
Appellants filed a complaint on June 9, 1998, asserting causes of action for sex discrimination, sexual harassment, negligent failure to provide a safe work environment, retaliation, breach of contract, and aiding others in the commission of acts prohibited by R.C. 4112.02, and seeking injunctive…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Harris v. Forklift Systems, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Faragher v. City of Boca RatonSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Samadder v. DMF of Ohio, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2003
- Beckloff v. Amcor Rigid Plastics USA, L.L.C.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2017
- Sharon Ault v. Oberlin CollegeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2015
- Chapa v. Genpak, L.L.C.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2014
- State Ex Rel. DeWine v. S & R Recycling, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2011
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.