Legal Opinion

Cummings v. Commonwealth Edison Co.

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided November 1, 1965No. Gen. 50,002PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Kluczynski

Plaintiff, Opal Cummings, a customer of defendant, Commonwealth Edison Company, filed a class suit on behalf of all customers of Edison, alleging that rates charged by Edison for electricity service are and were excessive to the extent that its plant and property account includes excess sums paid by Edison for electrical equipment as a result of a conspiracy between electrical equipment manufacturers in violation of antitrust laws. The action seeks (1) the refund to such customers of monies repaid to Edison as the result of civil antitrust suits instituted by it in the federal courts to…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Owens v. GreenIllinois Supreme Court · 1948
  2. Federal Power Commission v. Interstate Natural Gas Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
  3. Terminal Railroad Ass'n v. Public Utilities CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1922
  4. Adler v. Northern Illinois Gas Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1965
  5. Medusa Portland Cement Co. v. Illinois Central RailroadAppellate Court of Illinois · 1936

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Gowdey v. Commonwealth Edison Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1976
  2. Boshes v. General Motors Corp.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1973
  3. Commonwealth Edison Co. v. Community Unit School District No. 200Appellate Court of Illinois · 1976
  4. Miles Homes, Inc. v. MintjalAppellate Court of Illinois · 1974
  5. Sutherland v. Illinois BellAppellate Court of Illinois · 1993

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API