Legal Opinion
United States v. Mendoza
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided November 7, 2012No. 10-4165PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LUCERO, Circuit Judge.
We must determine whether a judgment has been “entered on the criminal docket” for purposes of Fed. R.App. P. 4(b)(6) if it is noted only on an internal district court document that is not publicly accessible. Following sentencing of Francisco Mendoza, the district court filed a sealed judgment on a document labeled “Criminal Docket ... Internal Use Only.” The criminal docket available to the public contains no indication that judgment was ever entered. We conclude that this procedure does not satisfy Rule 4(b)(6). Dockets and docket sheets have traditionally been…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Griffin v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
- Puckett v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Federal Communications Commission v. Fox Television Stations, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bankers Trust Co. v. MallisSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Sebastian Mangiafico v. Richard Blumenthal, Attorney General, John Armstrong, and Theresa Lantz, Docket No. 05-5465-CvCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2006
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Company Doe v. Public CitizenCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2014
- United States v. Rosales-MirandaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2014
- United States v. WolfnameCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2016
- United States v. Ibarra-DiazCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2015
- United States v. BookerCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2023
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.