Legal Opinion

Tucker v. Calmar Steamship Corporation

District Court, D. Maryland

Decided March 21, 1973No. Civ. 20461PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FRANK A. KAUFMAN, District Judge.

This case is presently before this Court upon remand by the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit “with directions to enter judgment for the plaintiff and to assess damages,” Tucker v. Calmar Steamship Corp. v. Jarka Corp. of Baltimore, 457 F.2d 440, 446 (4th Cir. 1972). 1 Since the remand there has been an evidentiary hearing in this Court in which this Court concluded that contrary to Tucker’s contentions, no post-remand settlement agreement was entered into by persons acting on behalf of Tucker and Calmar. 2 Accordingly, this Court set this…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Littman v. Bell Tel. Co. of Pa.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
  2. Rogers v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1954
  3. Paul v. Atlantic Refining Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1931
  4. Mohler v. WorleySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1955
  5. Coffman Ex Rel. Coffman v. St. Louis-San Francisco Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1964

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Steven L. Wilson v. Union Pacific Railroad CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1995
  2. Ramrattan v. Burger King Corp.District Court, D. Maryland · 1987
  3. Kassama v. MagatCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API