Emerson v. State
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the CourtTownsend, J.
The amended ground of the motion for new trial recites that, during the argument of counsel, the solicitor-general made the following argument in substance to the jury: *324that there had been a large number of colored persons before the court during this term for various crimes, and it was the responsibility of the jurors to correct this situation by giving more severe sentences; that it was the duty of the jurors to back up law-enforcement officers; that the large number of colored persons before the court for stabbings and shootings could be stopped by the jury handing down heavy sentences.…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Graham & the Title Guaranty & Surety Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- Heinz v. BackusCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1925
- Ivey v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1901
- Pelham & Havana Railroad v. ElliottCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1912
- Fitzgerald v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1937
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Wilhelm v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1974
- Cheney v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1998
- State v. DurdenSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1975
- State v. DurdenSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1975
- Wilhelm v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1974