Legal Opinion

Kunk v. Howell

Court of Appeals of Tennessee

Decided January 11, 1956PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMcAMIS, P. J.

This is an action for damages growing out of a three-car collision which occurred August 8,1953, on U. S. Highway 441 at a point 6 miles west of Sevier-ville. The plaintiffs are Clem and Helen Kunk, parents of Elmer B. Kunk, who was operating their Plymouth automobile and lost his life at the time of the collision. They appeal from a verdict and judgment in favor of the defendant Carl Huband. The defendant Patricia Howell appeals from a judgment for Mr. and Mrs. Kunk in the sum of $21,900.

The decedent, Elmer B. Kunk, 19 years of age and a resident of Dayton, Ohio, accompanied by three other…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Bryan v. Aetna Life Ins. Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1939
  2. Mahon v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1912
  3. Tennessee Cent. Ry. Co. v. McCowan Et Ux.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1945
  4. Hale v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1955
  5. Turner v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1902

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Tuggle v. Allright Parking Systems, Inc.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Grizzell v. FoxxCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1960
  3. Bailey v. DeverickDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1962
  4. Keller v. East Tennessee Production Credit Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1973
  5. Carney v. Coca-Cola Bottling Works of TullahomaCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1993

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API