Legal Opinion

Carney v. Coca-Cola Bottling Works of Tullahoma

Court of Appeals of Tennessee

Decided January 22, 1993PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

CANTRELL, Judge.

The two main issues in this appeal are: (1) whether a juror should have been excused for cause because she was acquainted with one of the parties, and (2) whether it was reversible error to charge the jury that violating a statute was negligence per se when there was no evidence that the statute applied. We find it was reversible error to charge the statute.

I

On a February morning in 1985, a driver employed by the Coca-Cola Bottling Works of Tullahoma, Inc. was making deliveries in the city of Shelbyville. He parked his truck on Lane Street in front of the Mus-grave…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. State v. IrickTennessee Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Durham v. StatesTennessee Supreme Court · 1945
  3. Turner v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1902
  4. Wilson v. TranbargerTennessee Supreme Court · 1965
  5. Kunk v. HowellCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1956

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Grandstaff v. HawksCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2000
  2. Loeffler v. KjellgrenCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1994
  3. THURSTON HENSLEY v. CSX Transp., Inc.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 2009
  4. Scarborough v. Brown Group, Inc.District Court, W.D. Tennessee · 1996
  5. Patterson-Khoury v. Wilson World Hotel-Cherry Road, Inc.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 2003

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API