Legal Opinion

Ex Parte Warren

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Decided March 24, 1928No. A-6770PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDavenport, J.

This is an original application to this court for a writ of habeas corpus, in which the petitioner, F. E. (Ed) Warren, alleges that he' is restrained of his liberty, and that he is unlawfully imprisoned in the penitentiary by John Q. Newell, warden; that he was committed to the state institution by the district court of Le-Flore county in 1920 to serve a term of life imprisonment for murder. Petitioner says:

“That this sentence was iby the Governor of the state, on or about ’September 14-, 1923, commuted to a term of six years. The commutation referred to was in writing, unconditional in form,…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Ex Parte CrumpCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1913
  2. Ex parte RenoSupreme Court of Missouri · 1877
  3. State ex rel. Murphy v. WolferSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1914
  4. Johnson v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1913
  5. Ex Parte HawkinsCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1913

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Torres v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 2005
  2. Ex Parte DentonCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1940
  3. Torres v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API