Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Myles v. Brunner

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided October 2, 2008No. 2008-1842PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Per curiam

{¶ 1} This is an expedited election action for a writ of mandamus to compel the secretary of state to issue a directive to county boards of elections that they may not reject an absentee-ballot application based on the applicant’s failure to mark a box. Because the secretary of state erroneously instructed boards of elections that certain absentee-ballot applications must be rejected when applicants do not mark a box next to a qualified-elector statement, we grant the writ.

McCain-Palin Absentee-Ballot Applications

{¶ 2} McCain-Palin 2008, Inc., distributed absentee-ballot applications to…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Lamie v. United States TrusteeSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  2. Iselin v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
  3. State ex rel. Steele v. MorrisseyOhio Supreme Court · 2004
  4. Mentor Lagoons, Inc. v. RubinOhio Supreme Court · 1987
  5. Stern v. Board of ElectionsOhio Supreme Court · 1968

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Ohio Ex Rel. Skaggs v. BrunnerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2008
  2. State ex rel. LetOhioVote.org v. BrunnerOhio Supreme Court · 2009
  3. The State Ex Rel. Walker Et Al. v. HustedOhio Supreme Court · 2015
  4. State Ex Rel. Stewart v. Clinton County Bd. of ElectionsOhio Supreme Court · 2010
  5. State ex rel. Skaggs v. BrunnerOhio Supreme Court · 2008

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API