Legal Opinion

State v. Tarantino

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin

Decided June 27, 1990No. 88-0176-CRPublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNettesheim, P.J.

Louis A. Tarantino, Jr. appeals from an order denying his motion for postcon-viction relief. A jury found Tarantino guilty of fourteen counts of first-degree sexual assault on three of his step daughters. At the jury trial, the state introduced videotaped testimony of the three child victims. The lead issue on appeal concerns the admissibility of the videotape under Wisconsin's videotape statute, sec. 908.08, Stats., and the constitutionality of that statute.

We conclude that the trial court properly admitted the videotaped testimony of all three victims under sec. 908.08, Stats., and that the…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. California v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. Palko v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
  3. State v. HoltCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1985
  4. State v. Hoa Duc PhamWisconsin Supreme Court · 1987
  5. State v. FawcettCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1988

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Martinez v. Department of Industry, Labor & Human RelationsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1992
  2. State v. LittrupCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1991
  3. State v. WebsterCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1995
  4. State v. David J.K.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1994
  5. State v. JamesCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2005

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API