Legal Opinion
Hunt v. Stimson
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided January 3, 1928No. 4743PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DENISON, Circuit, Judge.
Plaintiffs in error, a partnership* with headquarters at Nashville, Tenn., were manufacturers of lumber, controlling several small mills in Tennessee, and owning a mill in Georgia. They received from defendants in error an order for certain ash lumber, and acknowledged the order by letter dated March 15, 1920, the essential parts of which are as follows:
“J. W. Stimson & Co., Owensboro, Kentucky. Wo enter your order, dated March 12, 1920, No. 1195, and accept and agree to fill the same only upon, the conditions herein, stated. To be consigned to you as directed. Terms:…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- A. B. Small Co. v. Lamborn & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1925
- Goltra v. WeeksSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Morse Dry Dock & Repair Co. v. Susquehanna S. S. Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1923
- Lindlay v. RaydureDistrict Court, E.D. Kentucky · 1917
- Meurer Steel Barrel Co. v. MartinCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1924
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- State Ex Rel. State Highway Commission v. WarnerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1962
- Sylvan Crest Sand & Gravel Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1945
- Wark v. Ervin Press CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1931
- Companhia De Navegacao Lloyd Brasileiro v. C. G. Blake Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1929
- National Publishing Co. v. Hartford Fire InsuranceConnecticut Appellate Court · 2006
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.