Legal Opinion
Henley v. Philip Morris Inc.
California Court of Appeal
Decided December 23, 2003No. A086991PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
5 Cal.Rptr.3d 42 (2003)
112 Cal.App.4th 198
Patricia HENLEY, Plaintiff and Respondent,
v.
PHILIP MORRIS INC., Defendant and Appellant.
No. A086991.
Court of Appeal, First District, Division Four.
September 25, 2003.
Review Granted December 23, 2003.
Shook, Hardy & Bacon, Gerald V. Barron, Lucy E. Mason, San Francisco, Mordecai Dempsey Boone, Heller Ehrman White & McAuliffe, M. Laurence Popofsky, Curtis M. Caton, David B. Goodwin, San Francisco, Wayne Stephen Braveman, Nina A.M. Greeley, Arnold & Porter, Ronald C. Redcay, Murray R. Garnick, Robert A. McCarter, for Appellant.
Law Offices of Daniel U.…
2Cases cited71 opinions
- Landgraf v. USI Film ProductsSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Basic Inc. v. LevinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- BMW of North America, Inc. v. GoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Cipollone v. Liggett Group, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. CampbellSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
66 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Craig v. HolseyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2003
- Craig v. HolseyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2003