Miller v. Ballerino
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. Cyrus F. McNutt, Joseph E. Hannon, and Smith, McNutt & Hannon, for Appellant.
1Opinion of the CourtVan Dyke, J.
Appeal from a judgment in favor of the plaintiff, in the sum of one thousand dollars, and from' an order denying defendant’s motion for a new trial. The action is brought by the plaintiff, as assignee of Hatch, Miller & Brown, to recover for services rendered by them in the suit of Ballerino v. Ballerino, in the superior court of Los Angeles County.
The appellant contends that the court erred in overruling the defendant’s demurrer to the plaintiff’s complaint. The complaint alleges that between the twenty-fifth day of March, 1896, and the first day of June, 1897, Hatch, Miller & Brown rendered…
2Cited by6 opinions
- Cohn v. ThompsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
- Tasker v. CochraneCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928
- Schroeder v. WheelerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
- Prince v. KennedyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1906
- Tuppela v. MathisonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1923
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.